Is the ocean Florida’s untapped energy source?

floridaenergyThe answer to easing the energy crunch in one of the nation’s most populous states could lie underwater.

Sea turbines make electricity which moves via cable, left, to shore. A hydrogen by-product is collected on a ship.

Imagine if your utility company could harness the ocean’s current to power your house, cool your office, even charge your car.

Researchers at Florida Atlantic University are in the early stages of turning that idea into reality in the powerful Gulf Stream off the state’s eastern shore.

“If you can take an engine and put it on the back of a boat or propel a ship through water, why not take a look at the strength of the Gulf Stream and determine if that can actually turn a device and create energy?” asked Sue Skemp, executive director at Florida Atlantic University’s Center for Ocean Energy Technology.

The demand for energy in Florida — the fourth most populous state, with an estimated 19 million residents — is quickly outpacing the capacity to create it, according to experts. Video Watch how the proposed ocean turbines would work ยป

“Right now in Florida, we are at the cusp of an energy crisis. Our energy demand keeps growing,” said Frederick Driscoll, director of Florida Atlantic University’s Center of Excellence in Ocean Energy Technology.

Beginning in the Caribbean and ending in the upper-North Atlantic, the Gulf Stream lies on the eastern shore of Florida.

Its powerful currents have been used by many fishermen, sailors and explorers to expedite their passage in the Atlantic north and east to Europe, but scientists say the energy within its currents could propel Florida out of its potential energy crisis, powering 3 million to 7 million Florida homes — or supplying the state with one-third of its electricity.

“The predictions at this point estimate that the strength of the Gulf Stream could generate anywhere between four to 10 gigawatts of power, the equivalent of four to 10 nuclear power plants,” said Skemp.

“The Gulf Stream is the strongest current in the world, so we want to harness our greatest resource. It’s renewable, emission free and reliable,” said Jeremy Susac, executive director of the Florida Energy and Climate Commission.

At the university’s Center for Ocean Energy Technology in Boca Raton, Florida, ocean engineers are working with marine, environmental and material scientists to develop cost-competitive technologies to commercialize the energy within the Gulf Stream.

Though it has been considered for more than a century, harnessing the energy of the Gulf Stream is no easy task, and no sustainable system has been implemented.

“First we have to do a resource assessment and understand how much energy is in the Gulf Stream current on a minute-to-minute, day-to-day, hour-to-hour and yearly basis,” said Driscoll.

In April, researchers at the center deployed four acoustic Doppler current profilers in the Atlantic off the east coast of Florida.

Using high frequency, low-power sonar, these large orange ball-shaped objects measure the speed of the ocean currents.

“We are looking at how much energy we can safely extract — what is the sensitivity of extraction versus the environmental effects?” said Driscoll.

The vision for the pilot program is to develop and test a 20-kilowatt underwater turbine by spring 2010.

Sound familiar?

The concept behind underwater turbines is similar to that of wind turbines on land.

As water flows by the turbine, it turns a rotor blade. As the rotor blade turns, energy is generated.

That energy can be transmitted from a generator inside the turbine to electrical conducting cables, where it’s captured, harnessed and distributed for future use.

Researchers also are looking at ways to use the electricity that is generated underwater to generate and store hydrogen in the ocean. The hydrogen could be used to fuel clean-running cars and trucks.

“Because it’s such a new endeavor, there’s a lot of knowledge gaps not only in terms of the technology side but also on the ecological side of things,” said Driscoll.

Completely reliant

Florida is completely reliant on out-of-state fuel sources (coal and natural gas), but generates more than 90 percent of its own electricity, according to the Florida Energy and Climate Commission. It ranks third nationally in total energy consumption.

So how much will this endeavor cost? And what kind of impacts will it have on the local marine environment?

“Those are the questions we don’t have answers to,” said Skemp.

There are some hurdles that need to be cleared before the technology can get approval and become commercially available.

“This area is so new, we’re still finding out what needs to be done,” said Skemp.

“It’s not like an established industry, like the aerospace industry or the automotive industry or others, where you have models which you could base cost on,” added Skemp.

So far, the state of Florida has allocated $13.75 million in grants toward research and development of the pilot project, but the cost to implement the project on a large scale could be much higher.

Before a project like this can go forward, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission will have to look at a whole range of factors, from the effects it will have on wild and marine life to recreation activities and shipping, said an environmental specialist with the commission.

If the pilot program is successful, it could take another five to 10 years before the technology can be implemented.

The Gulf Stream is something that has been taken for granted, said Skemp.

“The Gulf Stream is on 24/7. It’s flowing 365 days a year, so it’s a continuous source of energy.”

http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/07/27/ocean.turbines/index.html

[Post to Twitter]  [Post to Plurk]  [Post to Yahoo Buzz]  [Post to Delicious]  [Post to Digg]  [Post to Ping.fm]  [Post to Reddit]  [Post to StumbleUpon] 

Comments (7)

 

  1. wayne says:

    To capture enough energy to compete with conventional power plants, these machines will be enormous, and therefore have low power density. Salt water is corrosive, especially to moving parts, so materials of construction will be expensive. Maintenace costs per kilowatt of energy will also be high. How do you protect them from debris, hurricanes, etc.? Don’t count on this technology making a practical contribution to our power grid.

  2. huh says:

    The Greens wind up stalling the current to disastrous effect, while other Greens swim th deep trying to wave marine life away from the turbines’ deadly blades.

  3. Karen Brewer says:

    If you’re capturing the energy from the heated (surface) temperature of the water, this concept would seem to harness most of its efficiency during the summer months (yet, off the coast of FL, that’s almost year-round). (1) Where would “excess” be harnessed to save for the cooler months (thus, expanding the technology to the entire nation); and (2) what consideration has been given to harnessing the power of hurricanes (which require warmer, and often times increase,ocean temperatures)? Seems they could act as a catalyst. [Not that I want any, mind you! :-D]

    Just curious………
    K~

  4. FlexSF says:

    This is potentially good news, but what are the negative effects, if any, on the natural inhabitants that live within the ocean, and it’s high speed currents? Is our need for energy more important than the potential destruction that it may cause?

    Instead of heaping unlimited amounts of energy on an overpopulated and environmentally unconscious state, like Florida, at the expense of the ocean life, and huge grants of money, it’s land mammals, humans, could wake up, and live their lives with dignity, and show respect, to the real, natural environment that they live in, and are surrounded by!

  5. Jon says:

    Has anyone thought of the consequences of water diversion caused by these turbines? Or has only a certain maximum level of resistance been considered to prevent this? If water is diverted to other channels, wouldn’t the water pass more easily over time to new channels that are developed? I don’t completely understand ocean currents but am wondering what the thoughts are here.

  6. Bunker says:

    I guess this one can be filed under the header “better late than never…” These current turbines were already studied and introduced to the public in the middle to late 80s… Yep we were already smart enough decades ago and yet for some reason it never got off the ground. One may wonder why.

  7. Ryan Lanham says:

    Several of us have started an OTEC pre-foundation on Facebook…it has over 270 members now I think. It can be found easily on Facebook by searching on “Ocean Thermal”

    The link above http://www.otec.pbworks.com is the beginnings of a wiki. Anyone interested in helping or becoming a fan is most welcome.

    Ryan Lanham

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.